Comparison: Cubic capacity Ford Ranger vs. competitors 2025

1.Generation 1999
Ranger 1. Generation (1. Facelift) 2002
2.Generation 2007
2.Generation (1. Facelift) 2009
Ranger 3. Generation 2011
Ranger 3. Generation (1. Facelift) 2016
Ranger 3. Generation (2. Facelift) 2019
Ranger 4. Generation 2022

Table of contents:

Ford Ranger - What is the cubic capacity of different engines?

Ford Ranger engines

(Cubic capacity)
1. Doppelkabine 2.0 EcoBlue Limited 4x4 {automatic} 125 kW 1996 ccm
2. Doppelkabine 2.0 EcoBlue Limited 4x4 125 kW 1996 ccm
3. Doppelkabine 2.0 EcoBlue Wildtrack e-4WD {automatic} 151 kW 1996 ccm
4. Raptor 2.0 EcoBlue e-4WD {automatic} 154 kW 1996 ccm
5. Doppelkabine 2.3 EcoBoost PHEV XLT e-4WD {automatic} 207 kW 2296 ccm
6. Raptor 3.0 EcoBoost e-4WD {automatic} 212 kW 2956 ccm
7. Doppelkabine 3.0 EcoBlue Wildtrack e-4WD {automatic} 177 kW 2993 ccm

Variants

Ford Ranger variants: Ranger vs. Ranger Raptor

(Cubic capacity)
1. Ranger 1996 ccm
2. Ranger Raptor 1996 ccm

The cubic capacity compared to other Ford models

Ford Ranger vs other current cars by Ford

(Cubic capacity)
1. EcoSport 1.0 EcoBoost ST-Line 103 kW 998 ccm
2. Tourneo Courier 1.0 EcoBoost Start/Stopp Trend 92 kW 998 ccm
3. Transit Courier {VAN} {VAN} 1.5 TDCi Limited 55 kW 998 ccm
4. Transit Courier Kombi {VAN} 1.5 TDCi Limited 55 kW 998 ccm
5. Focus Turnier ST 206 kW 999 ccm
6. Focus Active Turnier ST 206 kW 999 ccm
7. Focus Active Turnier Turnier ST 206 kW 999 ccm
8. Focus Turnier Turnier ST 206 kW 999 ccm
9. Puma ST 147 kW 999 ccm
10. Ka+ 1.2 52 kW 1194 ccm
11. Fiesta ST 1.5 EcoBoost X 147 kW 1496 ccm
12. Puma ST ST 147 kW 1496 ccm
13. Kuga 2.5 PHEV Titanium CVT 178 kW 1497 ccm
14. Tourneo Connect 1.5 EcoBoost PHEV Trend {automatic} 110 kW 1498 ccm
15. Mondeo Turnier 2.0 EcoBlue Business Edition {automatic} 140 kW 1498 ccm
16. Galaxy 2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo Titanium {automatic} 177 kW 1499 ccm
17. S-MAX 2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo ST-Line {automatic} 177 kW 1499 ccm
18. Transit Connect {VAN} {VAN} 210 L2 1.5 EcoBlue Basis 55 kW 1499 ccm
19. Transit Connect Kombi {VAN} 210 L2 1.5 EcoBlue Basis 55 kW 1499 ccm
20. Transit Kombi Kombi 350 L2 2.0 TDCi Trend 77 kW 1995 ccm
21. Edge 2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo Titanium 4x4 Automatik 175 kW 1995 ccm
22. Transit Custom {VAN} Kombi 320 L1 2.0 EcoBlue Mild-Hybrid Trend 77 kW 1995 ccm
23. Transit Custom Kombi Kombi 320 L1 2.0 EcoBlue Mild-Hybrid Trend 77 kW 1995 ccm
24. Transit Custom Kombi Nugget Kombi 320 L1 2.0 EcoBlue Mild-Hybrid Trend 77 kW 1995 ccm
25. Ranger Raptor 3.0 EcoBoost e-4WD {automatic} 212 kW 1996 ccm
26. Ranger Raptor Raptor 3.0 EcoBoost e-4WD {automatic} 212 kW 1996 ccm
27. Tourneo Custom 340 L2 2.5 Duratec PHEV Sport {automatic} 171 kW 1996 ccm
28. Transit Custom Nugget Kombi 320 L2 2.0 EcoBlue Trend 81 kW 1996 ccm
29. Mondeo {sedan} Turnier 2.0 EcoBlue Business Edition {automatic} 140 kW 1999 ccm
30. Mondeo Turnier Turnier 2.0 EcoBlue Business Edition {automatic} 140 kW 1999 ccm
31. Focus ST Turnier ST 206 kW 2261 ccm
32. Focus ST Turnier Turnier ST 206 kW 2261 ccm
33. Mustang Convertible Convertible 2.3 EcoBoost {automatic} 213 kW 2261 ccm
34. Kuga Active 2.5 PHEV Titanium CVT 178 kW 2488 ccm
35. Bronco 2.7 Ti-VCT EcoBoost Outer Banks 4x4 {automatic} 246 kW 2694 ccm
36. Explorer 3.0 EcoBoost Plug-in-Hybrid Platinum {automatic} 336 kW 2956 ccm
37. GT 475kW 2017 (a) 482 kW 3497 ccm
38. Mustang Fastback Convertible 2.3 EcoBoost {automatic} 213 kW 5038 ccm

How does the cubic capacity of the Ford Ranger compare to it's nearest competitors?

Ford Ranger vs. similar cars

(Cubic capacity)
1. Toyota Hilux Single Cab 2.4 D-4D 2020 2393 ccm
2. Renault Master Kastenwagen L1H1 2,8t Blue dCi 135 2020 2299 ccm
3. Hyundai Staria 2.2 CRDi 2021 2199 ccm
4. Peugeot Boxer Kombi L1H1 330 2.2 HDi FAP 2014 2198 ccm
5. Toyota Proace Max Kastenwagen L2H1 33 2.2 D 2024 2184 ccm
6. Citroen Jumper Kastenwagen L1H1 28 2.2 BlueHDi 2014 2179 ccm
7. SsangYong Musso 2.2 Diesel 2022 2157 ccm
8. Citroen Holidays BlueHDi 145 Start&Stop 2024 1997 ccm
9. Renault Trafic Combi ENERGY dCi 120 2019 1997 ccm
10. Nissan Primastar Kombi L1H1 2,8t dCi 110 2021 1997 ccm
11. Peugeot Expert Kastenwagen L1 BlueHDi 120 S&S 2016 1997 ccm
12. VW Nutzfahrzeuge Amarok Doppelkabine 2.0 TDI SCR 2023 1996 ccm
13. Maxus T60 MAX 2.0 Diesel 2025 1996 ccm
14. Ford Tourneo Custom 320 L1 2.0 EcoBlue 2023 1996 ccm
15. Ford Ranger Doppelkabine 2.0 EcoBlue 2022 1996 ccm
16. Ford Transit Kombi 310 L2 2.0 TDCi 2019 1995 ccm
17. Ford Transit Custom Kombi 320 L1 Nugget Aufstelldach 2.0 TDCi 2018 1995 ccm
18. VW Nutzfahrzeuge T6.1 California 2.0 TDI BMT 2019 1968 ccm
19. VW Nutzfahrzeuge Caddy Cargo 2.0 TDI SCR 2020 1968 ccm
20. Fiat Ducato Kombi 30 kurz 115 Multijet 2014 1956 ccm
21. Isuzu D-Max Space Cab 1.9 Diesel 2024 1898 ccm
22. Toyota Proace Kombi L1 1.6 D-4D 2016 1560 ccm
23. Opel Vivaro Cargo S 1.5 Diesel 2019 1499 ccm
24. Ford Transit Connect Kastenwagen 200 L1 1.5 EcoBlue 2018 1499 ccm
25. Citroen Jumpy Kastenwagen XS BlueHDi 100 Start&Stop 2016 1499 ccm
26. Fiat Tipo Kombi 1.3 Multijet 2020 1248 ccm

Similar cars

VW Nutzfahrzeuge Amarok
Cubic capacity:
0% (1996 ccm)


Compare
SsangYong Musso
Cubic capacity:
+8% (2157 ccm)


Compare
Toyota Hilux
Cubic capacity:
+20% (2393 ccm)


Compare
Maxus T60 MAX
Cubic capacity:
0% (1996 ccm)


Compare
Isuzu D-Max
Cubic capacity:
-5% (1898 ccm)


Compare
Maxus eTERRON 9
Cubic capacity:
-100% (0 ccm)


Compare
Maxus T90 EV
Cubic capacity:
-100% (0 ccm)


Compare
Citroen Holidays
Cubic capacity:
0% (1997 ccm)


Compare
Ford Transit
Cubic capacity:
-0% (1995 ccm)


Compare
Renault Trafic
Cubic capacity:
0% (1997 ccm)


Compare
Ford Transit Custom
Cubic capacity:
-0% (1995 ccm)


Compare
Ford Tourneo Custom
Cubic capacity:
0% (1996 ccm)


Compare
VW Nutzfahrzeuge Transporter
Cubic capacity:
-1% (1968 ccm)


Compare

Compare with ...

TOPlist