Comparison: Combined consumption (WLTP) Mazda MX-5 vs. competitors 2025

Table of contents:

Overview of engines
Comparison to similar cars
Comparison to other Mazda models
Variants

Mazda MX-5 - What is the combined consumption (wltp) of different engines?

Mazda MX-5 engines

(Combined consumption (WLTP))

Mazda MX-5 engines
Engine	Combined consumption (WLTP)
SKYACTIV-G 132 Prime-Line 97 kW	6 l/100km
SKYACTIV-G 184 Exclusive-Line 135 kW	6 l/100km
RF SKYACTIV-G 184 Kazari {automatic} 135 kW	7 l/100km

1. SKYACTIV-G 132 Prime-Line 97 kW 6 l/100km

2. SKYACTIV-G 184 Exclusive-Line 135 kW 6 l/100km

3. RF SKYACTIV-G 184 Kazari {automatic} 135 kW 7 l/100km

Variants

Mazda MX-5 variants: MX-5 RF vs. MX-5 Roadster

(Combined consumption (WLTP))

Combined consumption (WLTP): Mazda MX-5 variants
Variant name	Combined consumption (WLTP)
MX-5 RF	6 l/100km
MX-5 Roadster	6 l/100km

1. MX-5 RF 6 l/100km

2. MX-5 Roadster 6 l/100km

The combined consumption (wltp) compared to other Mazda models

Mazda MX-5 vs other current cars by Mazda

(Combined consumption (WLTP))

Combined consumption (WLTP): MX-5 vs. other models by Mazda
Variant name	Combined consumption (WLTP)
CX-60 e-Skyactiv PHEV Prime-Line AWD {automatic} 241 kW	1 l/100km
CX-80 e-Skyactiv PHEV Exclusive-Line AWD {automatic} 241 kW	1 l/100km
2 Hybrid Pure CVT 85 kW	3 l/100km
2 e-SKYACTIV-G 115 M Hybrid Exclusive-Line 85 kW	4 l/100km
3 Fastback 2.0 e-SKYACTIV-X 186 Center-Line 137 kW	5 l/100km
CX-30 e-SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid 137 kW	5 l/100km
MX-5 RF RF SKYACTIV-G 132 Homura 97 kW	6 l/100km
MX-5 Roadster RF SKYACTIV-G 132 Homura 97 kW	6 l/100km
6 Kombi Kombi SKYACTIV-G 145 Exclusive-Line 107 kW	6 l/100km
6 {sedan} Kombi SKYACTIV-G 145 Exclusive-Line 107 kW	6 l/100km
CX-5 e-SKYACTIV-G 194 Exclusive-Line SKYACTIV-Drive 143 kW	6 l/100km
3 2.0 e-SKYACTIV-X 186 Center-Line 137 kW	6 l/100km
CX-3 SKYACTIV-G 150 Kangei AWD 110 kW	6 l/100km
6e e 245 Long Range Takumi Plus 180 kW	16 l/100km
MX-30 e-SKYACTIV R-EV Prime-Line 125 kW	19 l/100km

1. CX-60 e-Skyactiv PHEV Prime-Line AWD {automatic} 241 kW 1 l/100km

2. CX-80 e-Skyactiv PHEV Exclusive-Line AWD {automatic} 241 kW 1 l/100km

3. 2 Hybrid Pure CVT 85 kW 3 l/100km

4. 2 e-SKYACTIV-G 115 M Hybrid Exclusive-Line 85 kW 4 l/100km

5. 3 Fastback 2.0 e-SKYACTIV-X 186 Center-Line 137 kW 5 l/100km

6. CX-30 e-SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid 137 kW 5 l/100km

7. MX-5 RF RF SKYACTIV-G 132 Homura 97 kW 6 l/100km

8. MX-5 Roadster RF SKYACTIV-G 132 Homura 97 kW 6 l/100km

9. 6 Kombi Kombi SKYACTIV-G 145 Exclusive-Line 107 kW 6 l/100km

10. 6 {sedan} Kombi SKYACTIV-G 145 Exclusive-Line 107 kW 6 l/100km

11. CX-5 e-SKYACTIV-G 194 Exclusive-Line SKYACTIV-Drive 143 kW 6 l/100km

12. 3 2.0 e-SKYACTIV-X 186 Center-Line 137 kW 6 l/100km

13. CX-3 SKYACTIV-G 150 Kangei AWD 110 kW 6 l/100km

14. 6e e 245 Long Range Takumi Plus 180 kW 16 l/100km

15. MX-30 e-SKYACTIV R-EV Prime-Line 125 kW 19 l/100km

How does the combined consumption (wltp) of the Mazda MX-5 compare to it's nearest competitors?

Mazda MX-5 vs. similar cars

(Combined consumption (WLTP))

Combined consumption (WLTP): Mazda MX-5 vs. similar cars
Car model	Combined consumption (WLTP)
Toyota Yaris 1.5 2020	4 l/100km
Suzuki Swift 1.2 Dualjet Hybrid 2024	4 l/100km
Toyota Aygo X 1.0 2022	4 l/100km
Fiat Panda 1.0 GSE Hybrid 2020	5 l/100km
Suzuki S-Cross 1.4 Boosterjet Hybrid 2022	5 l/100km
Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost Hybrid 2024	5 l/100km
DS Automobiles DS 3 PureTech 100 2023	5 l/100km
Peugeot 2008 1.2 PureTech 100 2023	5 l/100km
VW T-Cross 1.0 TSI OPF 2024	5 l/100km
Hyundai Bayon 1.0 T-GDI 2024	5 l/100km
VW Taigo 1.0 TSI OPF 2021	5 l/100km
Peugeot 208 1.2 PureTech 75 2023	5 l/100km
SEAT Arona 1.0 TSI 2021	5 l/100km
Mitsubishi Colt 1.0 Turbo 2023	5 l/100km
Opel Corsa 1.2 2023	5 l/100km
Renault Clio SCe 65 2023	5 l/100km
Hyundai i20 1.2 2023	5 l/100km
KIA Picanto 1.0 2024	5 l/100km
SEAT Ibiza 1.0 MPI 2021	5 l/100km
Hyundai i10 1.0 2023	5 l/100km
VW T-Roc 1.0 TSI OPF 2022	6 l/100km
Mazda MX-5 1.5 SKYACTIV-G 132 2023	6 l/100km
KGM Tivoli 1.5 GDI-T 2025	7 l/100km
Subaru BRZ 2.4 2023	8 l/100km

1. Toyota Yaris 1.5 2020 4 l/100km

2. Suzuki Swift 1.2 Dualjet Hybrid 2024 4 l/100km

3. Toyota Aygo X 1.0 2022 4 l/100km

4. Fiat Panda 1.0 GSE Hybrid 2020 5 l/100km

5. Suzuki S-Cross 1.4 Boosterjet Hybrid 2022 5 l/100km

6. Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost Hybrid 2024 5 l/100km

7. DS Automobiles DS 3 PureTech 100 2023 5 l/100km

8. Peugeot 2008 1.2 PureTech 100 2023 5 l/100km

9. VW T-Cross 1.0 TSI OPF 2024 5 l/100km

10. Hyundai Bayon 1.0 T-GDI 2024 5 l/100km

11. VW Taigo 1.0 TSI OPF 2021 5 l/100km

12. Peugeot 208 1.2 PureTech 75 2023 5 l/100km

13. SEAT Arona 1.0 TSI 2021 5 l/100km

14. Mitsubishi Colt 1.0 Turbo 2023 5 l/100km

15. Opel Corsa 1.2 2023 5 l/100km

16. Renault Clio SCe 65 2023 5 l/100km

17. Hyundai i20 1.2 2023 5 l/100km

18. KIA Picanto 1.0 2024 5 l/100km

19. SEAT Ibiza 1.0 MPI 2021 5 l/100km

20. Hyundai i10 1.0 2023 5 l/100km

21. VW T-Roc 1.0 TSI OPF 2022 6 l/100km

22. Mazda MX-5 1.5 SKYACTIV-G 132 2023 6 l/100km

23. KGM Tivoli 1.5 GDI-T 2025 7 l/100km

24. Subaru BRZ 2.4 2023 8 l/100km

Similar cars

Morgan Plus Four

2020

Body type

Roadster

Length

3830 mm

Width

1650 mm

Height

1250 mm

Wheelbase

2520 mm

Weight

1013 kg

Doors

Combined consumption (WLTP)

0 l/100km (-100%)

Compare

Morgan Plus Six

2019

Body type

Roadster

Length

3890 mm

Width

1756 mm

Height

1220 mm

Wheelbase

2520 mm

Weight

1075 kg

Doors

Combined consumption (WLTP)

0 l/100km (-100%)

Compare

Fiat Panda

2020 • Typ 312

Body type

Hatchback

Length

3653 mm

Width

1643 mm

Height

1551 mm

Wheelbase

2300 mm

Boot capacity

225 l

Weight

1055 kg

Doors

Combined consumption (WLTP)

5 l/100km (-17%)

Compare

VW T-Roc

2022 • A1

Body type

SUV

Length

4236 mm

Width

1819 mm

Height

1584 mm

Wheelbase

2590 mm

Boot capacity

445 l

Weight

1301 kg

Doors

Combined consumption (WLTP)

6 l/100km (0%)

Compare

Suzuki S-Cross

2022 • JY

Body type

SUV

Length

4300 mm

Width

1785 mm

Height

1580 mm

Wheelbase

2600 mm

Boot capacity

430 l

Weight

1280 kg

Doors

Combined consumption (WLTP)

5 l/100km (-17%)

Compare

Ford Puma

2024 • J2K

Body type

SUV

Length

4186 mm

Width

1805 mm

Height

1550 mm

Wheelbase

2588 mm

Boot capacity

456 l

Weight

1316 kg

Doors

Combined consumption (WLTP)

5 l/100km (-17%)

Compare

Subaru BRZ

2023 • Z2

Body type

Coupe

Length

4265 mm

Width

1775 mm

Height

1310 mm

Wheelbase

2575 mm

Boot capacity

237 l

Weight

1275 kg

Doors

Combined consumption (WLTP)

8 l/100km (+33%)

Compare

DS Automobiles DS 3

2023 • U

Body type

SUV

Length

4118 mm

Width

1791 mm

Height

1534 mm

Wheelbase

2558 mm

Boot capacity

350 l

Weight

1207 kg

Doors

Combined consumption (WLTP)

5 l/100km (-17%)

Compare

Peugeot 2008

2023 • U

Body type

SUV

Length

4304 mm

Width

1770 mm

Height

1523 mm

Wheelbase

2605 mm

Boot capacity

434 l

Weight

1263 kg

Doors

Combined consumption (WLTP)

5 l/100km (-17%)

Compare

VW T-Cross

2024 • C1

Body type

SUV

Length

4127 mm

Width

1784 mm

Height

1573 mm

Wheelbase

2551 mm

Boot capacity

455 l

Weight

1267 kg

Doors

Combined consumption (WLTP)

5 l/100km (-17%)

Compare

Compare with ...

Find the Perfect Match

Compare your car with other models