Comparison: width Mitsubishi ASX vs. competitors 2025

When comparing vehicle widths, it's often less about the millimeters and more about how that width impacts your driveability and comfort. Today, let’s delve into the Mitsubishi ASX, a compact SUV known for its versatility and efficiency, and see how it stacks up in terms of width against other models in the market. With its rich history dating back to 2010, the ASX has undergone multiple facelifts and a complete generational overhaul. But how has its width evolved, and where does it stand in the larger automotive lineup, both within Mitsubishi and compared to its closest competitors?

Table of contents:

Mitsubishi ASX - How has the width changed over the generations?

The first generation of the Mitsubishi ASX, running from 2010 to 2021, maintained a consistent width of 1770 mm across its numerous facelifts and updates. In 2023, Mitsubishi unveiled the second generation, which saw a slight increase in width to 1797 mm. Although the difference of 27 mm might seem trivial, in the world of SUVs, these modest adjustments can mean the world of difference to interior space and road presence. It’s no wonder that the trunk size with the rear seats folded also grew significantly from 1206 mm in the first generation to 1275 mm in the current lineup.

Mitsubishi ASX generations

(Width)
1. ASX, Model year 2010 (1.Generation) 1770 mm
2. ASX, Model year 2012 (1.Generation (1. Facelift)) 1770 mm
3. ASX, Model year 2016 (1.Generation (2. Facelift)) 1770 mm
4. ASX, Model year 2019 (1.Generation (3. Facelift)) 1770 mm
5. ASX, Model year 2023 (ASX 2. Generation) 1797 mm
6. ASX, Model year 2024 (ASX 2. Generation (1. Facelift)) 1797 mm
The difference in width between first generation (1.Generation) from 2010 and last generation (ASX 2. Generation (1. Facelift)) from 2024 is 2.7cm mm.
The width of the current generation of ASX is 1797 mm.

The width compared to other Mitsubishi models

Let’s take a quick pit stop and explore Mitsubishi's broader line-up. The ASX, in its newfound width of 1797 mm, finds itself firmly in the middle. The plucky Mitsubishi Space Star is quite diminutive at 1665 mm wide, making it a perfect choice for city dwellers but not for those who crave a bit more elbow room. If you need more width but still want to stay within the Mitsubishi family, you can look at the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross, which stretches out to a slightly more dominating 1805 mm. The truly width-conscious might be intrigued by the Mitsubishi Colt, which even edges out the ASX at 1798 mm.

Mitsubishi ASX vs other current cars by Mitsubishi

(Width)
1. Space Star 1665 mm
2. ASX 1797 mm
3. Colt 1798 mm
4. Eclipse Cross 1805 mm
5. Outlander 1862 mm

How does the width of the Mitsubishi ASX compare to it's nearest competitors?

The Mitsubishi ASX faces some stiff competition. In the grand scheme of compact SUVs, the ASX's 1797 mm width often places it in the lower-middle tier. For instance, it’s narrower than the Renault Arkana at 1802 mm and significantly slimmer compared to the wide-bodied Suzuki Across at 1855 mm. Other noteworthy mentions include the Renault Scénic, slighter at 1785 mm, and the Toyota Yaris Cross, which is positively svelte at 1765 mm. To top it all off, there are heftier rivals like the CUPRA Formentor, boasting a width of 1839 mm. All these competitors also bring their own unique length and wheelbase dimensions into the mix, influencing the overall vehicle dynamics. For example, the Renault Arkana with a length of 4568 mm and a wheelbase of 2720 mm, offers a different driving experience compared to the more compact Toyota Yaris Cross, which measures 4180 mm in length and has a 2560 mm wheelbase.

Mitsubishi ASX vs. similar cars

(Width)
1. SsangYong Torres 2023 1890 mm
2. Hyundai ix35 2010 1890 mm
3. Volvo XC40 2022 1863 mm
4. Citroen C5 Aircross 2022 1859 mm
5. Chevrolet Captiva 2006 1850 mm
6. Opel Antara 2006 1850 mm
7. Mazda CX-5 2012 1840 mm
8. Renault Kadjar 2015 1836 mm
9. KIA XCeed 2022 1826 mm
10. Renault Austral 2022 1825 mm
11. Dacia Duster 2024 1813 mm
12. Peugeot 4007 2007 1805 mm
13. Mercedes-Benz GLA 2014 1804 mm
14. Citroen C4 Aircross 2012 1800 mm
15. Mazda Tribute 2000 1800 mm
16. Mitsubishi ASX 2024 1797 mm
17. Fiat 500X 2018 1796 mm
18. Mazda CX-30 2019 1795 mm
19. Skoda Yeti 2009 1793 mm
20. MINI Countryman 2010 1789 mm
21. MINI Paceman 2014 1786 mm
22. VW T-Cross 2024 1784 mm
23. Nissan Qashqai 2007 1783 mm
24. Subaru XV 2012 1780 mm
25. Renault Captur 2013 1778 mm
26. Jeep Avenger 2023 1776 mm
27. Hyundai Bayon 2024 1775 mm
28. Nissan X-Trail 2001 1765 mm
29. Mazda CX-3 2015 1765 mm
30. VW Taigo 2021 1757 mm
31. Honda CR-V 1996 1750 mm

Similar cars

Renault Captur
Width:
0% (1797 mm)


Compare
KIA XCeed
Width:
+2% (1826 mm)


Compare
Nissan Juke
Width:
0% (1800 mm)


Compare
Hyundai Bayon
Width:
-1% (1775 mm)


Compare
SEAT Ateca
Width:
+2% (1841 mm)


Compare
Skoda Kamiq
Width:
-0% (1793 mm)


Compare
Dacia Duster
Width:
+1% (1813 mm)


Compare
Peugeot 2008
Width:
-2% (1770 mm)


Compare
SEAT Arona
Width:
-1% (1780 mm)


Compare
KIA Sportage
Width:
+4% (1865 mm)


Compare
Citroen C3 Aircross
Width:
-0% (1795 mm)


Compare
Opel Grandland
Width:
+6% (1906 mm)


Compare
Renault Austral
Width:
+2% (1825 mm)


Compare
Suzuki S-Cross
Width:
-1% (1785 mm)


Compare

Compare with ...

TOPlist