Suzuki Swift generations
(Boot space)| Generation year | Boot space |
|---|---|
| Swift, Model year 1984 (1.Generation) | 250 l |
| Swift, Model year 1986 (1.Generation (1. Facelift)) | 250 l |
| Swift, Model year 1989 (2.Generation) | 250 l |
| Swift, Model year 1995 (3.Generation) | 280 l |
| Swift, Model year 2005 (4.Generation) | 213 l |
| Swift, Model year 2008 (4.Generation (1. Facelift)) | 213 l |
| Swift, Model year 2010 (5.Generation) | 211 l |
| Swift, Model year 2013 (5.Generation (1. Facelift)) | 211 l |
| Swift, Model year 2017 (6.Generation) | 265 l |
| Swift, Model year 2024 (Swift 7. Generation) | 265 l |
The boot space compared to other Suzuki models
In the grand lineup of Suzuki's wheeled warriors, the Swift finds itself in a rather peculiar position. It rubs shoulders with the likes of the Ignis, sporting a practically identical boot size of 267 litres, just a whisper more capacious and arguably more quirky. And let's not even start on the Jimny - a model that laughs in the face of luggage with a boot space of 85 litres, essentially a glove box on wheels. Meanwhile, the Vitara lounges in the corner, boasting a boot so voluminous (375 litres) it might as well have its own postcode, dwarfing the Swift's comparatively modest offering. Yet, the Swift holds its own with dignity, striking a balance between being a city slicker and a weekend escape pod.
Suzuki Swift vs other current cars by Suzuki
(Boot space)| Variant name | Boot space |
|---|---|
| Jimny | 85 l |
| Swift | 265 l |
| Swift Sport | 265 l |
| Ignis | 267 l |
| Vitara | 375 l |
| S-Cross | 430 l |
| Across | 490 l |
| Swace | 596 l |
How does the boot space of the Suzuki Swift compare to it's nearest competitors?
But how does our valiant Swift square up against the automotive riff-raff? The VW Scirocco, for instance, sits there with its 312 litres of boot space, smugly thinking it's got one over on the Swift, with an extra 47 litres. The Mazda 3 taunts with its 346 litres, leaving the Swift trailing in its compact dust. Yet, in the arena of wheelbases and overall length, the Swift cleverly compensates with nimbleness and a footprint that's as city-friendly as a scooter. On the other end, the VW Beetle, a direct competitor in terms of quirkiness, offers a paltry 209 litres, making the Swift seem like a cargo ship by comparison. Even the Honda HR-V, with its 285 litres, bows down to the mighty Swift's clever use of space. In the grand scheme of things, Suzuki's marvel proves that size isn't everything, unless we're talking boot space, of course, where every litre counts in the urban jungle.
Suzuki Swift vs. similar cars
(Boot space)| Car model | Boot space |
|---|---|
| Nissan Townstar 2022 | 775 l |
| SsangYong Torres 2023 | 703 l |
| Opel Grandland 2022 | 514 l |
| Renault Austral 2022 | 500 l |
| SEAT Toledo 1999 | 500 l |
| Ligier Myli 2023 | 459 l |
| VW Bora 1998 | 455 l |
| VW Taigo 2021 | 440 l |
| Suzuki S-Cross 2022 | 430 l |
| Hyundai Bayon 2021 | 411 l |
| Toyota Prius 2004 | 408 l |
| Daewoo Nexia 1995 | 380 l |
| Rover 45 2004 | 370 l |
| BYD Dolphin 2023 | 345 l |
| Alpine A290 2024 | 326 l |
| MG MG3 2024 | 293 l |
| Alfa Romeo 147 2005 | 292 l |
| Ford Ka+ 2018 | 270 l |
| Suzuki Swift 2024 | 265 l |
| Ford Puma 1997 | 240 l |
| Elaris Dyo 2023 | 229 l |
| GWM ORA 03 2024 | 228 l |
| Estrima Birò 2022 | 122 l |
| Fiat Topolino 2023 | 63 l |
| Citroen Ami 2024 | 63 l |
