When discussing the cavernous realms of automotive boot space, the Volvo XC40 presents an intriguing case. Not merely a container for your groceries, the boot of a car often becomes the deciding factor for the pragmatic buyer. And when we compare the boxy stalwart from Sweden against its rivals, it's like stepping into an arena where every cubic litre counts. But remember, this isn't just a numbers game; it's a battle of practicality, usability, and those little design nuances that can turn a cramped boot into a cavernous lair.
Volvo XC40 - How has the boot space changed over the generations?
As for the evolution of the Volvo XC40's boot space through its generations, it's a bit like trying to observe the growth pattern of a Swedish Fir in winter - nothing much seems to happen. With data as elusive as the mysterious post-fix 'l' liter measurement from the current and past generations, one might be tempted to think Volvo's been playing it coy. However, for the enthusiasts and potential buyers out there, rest assured that despite the numerical ambiguity, the XC40 has always been about providing a wholesome and practical package, its boot space included. This is not just about numbers but how smartly the space is utilized.
Volvo XC40 generations
(Boot space)
Volvo XC40 generationsGeneration year | Boot space |
---|
XC40, Model year 2018 (1.Generation) | 433 l |
XC40, Model year 2022 (XC40 1. Generation (1. Facelift)) | 433 l |
The difference in Boot space between first generation (1.Generation) from 2018 and last generation (XC40 1. Generation (1. Facelift)) from 2022 is 0 l.
The boot space of the current generation of XC40 is 433 l.
Variants
Volvo XC40 variants: XC40 vs. XC40 Recharge Plug-in Hybrid vs. XC40 Recharge Pure Electric
(Boot space)
Boot space: Volvo XC40 variantsVariant name | Boot space |
---|
XC40 | 433 l |
XC40 Recharge Plug-in Hybrid | 405 l |
XC40 Recharge Pure Electric | 419 l |
The boot space compared to other Volvo models
In comparison to its lofty siblings in the Volvo line-up, the Volvo XC40 finds itself jostling for room. When you pit it against the likes of the Volvo XC90, with its boot space touting 310 liters, and the even more cavernous Volvo V90 Cross Country's 507 liters, our plucky XC40 might seem like it's brought a knife to a gun fight. But it's not all doom and gloom; what the XC40 lacks in sheer volume, it makes up for in clever design and functionality. It's the agile middle child, capable of holding its own amidst the giants.
Volvo XC40 vs other current cars by Volvo
(Boot space)
Boot space: XC40 vs. other models by VolvoVariant name | Boot space |
---|
XC90 Recharge Plug-in Hybrid | 262 l |
EX90 | 310 l |
XC90 | 310 l |
EX30 | 318 l |
S60 Recharge Plug-in Hybrid | 391 l |
EC40 | 404 l |
XC40 Recharge Plug-in Hybrid | 405 l |
EX40 | 410 l |
XC40 Recharge Pure Electric | 419 l |
ES90 | 424 l |
S60 | 427 l |
S90 Recharge Plug-in Hybrid | 431 l |
XC40 | 433 l |
S90 | 453 l |
XC60 Recharge Plug-in Hybrid | 468 l |
V60 Recharge Plug-in Hybrid | 481 l |
XC60 | 483 l |
V90 Recharge Plug-in Hybrid | 488 l |
V60 | 495 l |
V60 Cross Country | 495 l |
V90 | 507 l |
V90 Cross Country | 507 l |
How does the boot space of the Volvo XC40 compare to it's nearest competitors?
On the broader stage, amongst its rivals, the XC40 tells a tale of David and Goliath. Take the Dacia Jogger, for example, with a boot space resembling a small hangar at 160 liters, or the Porsche Cayenne at 540 liters, and you'd think the XC40 would cower. But no, Volvo's contender brings more to the ring than just space. Against the Toyota Corolla Cross and its 414 liters, the XC40 argues that size isn't everything, with superior design and utility. Then there's the battle with the likes of the Genesis GV80 and its whopping 735 liters - a leviathan against which many would falter. Yet, in these comparisons, we're reminded that it's not just the size of the boot but how you use it that counts. And in this, the XC40, with its smart functionalities and Swedish practicality, often emerges more versatile than its rivals, robustly claiming its position in the compact SUV segment.
Volvo XC40 vs. similar cars
(Boot space)
Boot space: Volvo XC40 vs. similar carsCar model | Boot space |
---|
SEAT Tarraco 2019 | 760 l |
SsangYong Torres 2023 | 703 l |
KGM Actyon 2025 | 668 l |
Citroen C5 Aircross 2022 | 580 l |
KIA Sorento 2009 | 531 l |
Dacia Duster 2024 | 517 l |
Opel Grandland 2022 | 514 l |
Peugeot 4007 2007 | 510 l |
BMW X1 2015 | 505 l |
Mazda CX-5 2012 | 503 l |
Renault Austral 2022 | 500 l |
VW T-Cross 2024 | 455 l |
Mazda CX-7 2007 | 455 l |
CUPRA Formentor 2020 | 450 l |
MG ZS 2021 | 448 l |
VW T-Roc 2022 | 445 l |
VW Taigo 2021 | 440 l |
Volvo XC40 2022 | 433 l |
Mazda CX-30 2019 | 430 l |
Suzuki S-Cross 2022 | 430 l |
KIA XCeed 2022 | 426 l |
Mercedes-Benz GLA 2014 | 421 l |
Hyundai Bayon 2024 | 411 l |
Skoda Kamiq 2024 | 400 l |
SEAT Arona 2021 | 400 l |
SsangYong Tivoli 2019 | 395 l |
Jeep Avenger 2023 | 380 l |
Toyota C-HR 2019 | 377 l |
Jeep Renegade 2018 | 351 l |
Fiat 500X 2018 | 350 l |
Similar cars