Comparison:Ford Fiesta 2022 Vs. VW Polo 2021 (new)

Dimensions

Moving on to dimensions, the VW Polo trumps the Ford Fiesta in terms of length (4074mm vs. 4048mm), width (1751mm vs. 1735mm), and wheelbase (2552mm vs. 2493mm). In terms of height, however, the Fiesta stands taller at 1490mm compared to the Polo's 1451mm. Another point to consider is the ground clearance; the Ford Fiesta allows for a minimum clearance of 122mm (1.0 EcoBoost ST-Line) and a maximum of 150mm (Active 1.0 EcoBoost). Regardless, it is quite clear that the VW Polo generally boasts larger as well as more impressive dimensions.

Boot/interior

When it comes to boot space, the Ford Fiesta outperforms the VW Polo, offering 292 litres of storage against the range of 251-351 litres found in the Polo, depending on the engine type. This edge, however, is reversed when we consider the boot space rear seats folded, as Polo offers an impressive 1125 litres, slightly above the Fiesta's respectable 1093 litres. Both Ford Fiesta and VW Polo comfortably seat five passengers and offer Isofix as standard. The Polo, with its five doors, provides more accessible entry for occupants than the three-door Fiesta.

Engines/drivetrain

Comparing their performance under the hood, the Fiesta is more efficient with 3 engine cylinders, contrary to the Polo which has engines with 3 or 4 cylinders (4 in GTI DSG). The Polo has a slightly higher range of maximum speed options, from 171km/h to 240km/h, while the Fiesta clocks in at 165-230km/h. The power and torque generated by the engines are quite similar; the Fiesta ranges from 55kW to 147kW, and 110Nm to 320Nm, whereas the Polo varies from 59kW to 152kW and 93Nm to 320Nm. Furthermore, the cubic capacity of the Fiesta extends from 999ccm to 1496ccm, while the Polo narrowly outdoes it with a range of 999ccm to 1984ccm. As for acceleration, the Fiesta and the Polo both achieve 0-100km/h in a minimum time of 6.5 seconds.

Consumption/ecology

In terms of fuel consumption, the Ford Fiesta features a larger tank size at 42 litres, as opposed to the Polo's range of 14-40 litres, depending on the engine type. The CO2 emissions (WLTP) show similar values, with the Fiesta ranging from 112.0g/km to 153.0g/km, while the Polo goes from 100.0g/km to 146.0g/km. Although tyre size comparison shows that the Fiesta has a slightly larger 195/60R15 size compared to the Polo’s 185/70R14, the Polo is slightly quieter, producing a noise range of 69dB to 71dB against the Fiesta's 66dB to 70dB. The VW Polo also has data available for combined and city consumption, with values in the NEDC operation mode ranging from 4.6l to 4.7l and 5.4l to 5.8l, respectively.

Weight/towing

Lastly, let's assess their weight and towing capabilities. The Fiesta’s empty weight (EU) ranges from 1144kg to 1280kg, whereas the Polo’s extends from 1132kg to 1361kg. With respect to permissible total weight, the Fiesta goes from 1515kg to 1705kg, and the Polo reaches a range of 1540kg to 1800kg. The Ford Fiesta dandles a braked trailer between 750kg and 1000kg, while the Polo manages 800kg to 1200kg, depending on the engine type. Interestingly, max roof load for the Polo is 75kg, substantially exceeding the Fiesta's 50kg. In sum, the VW Polo emerges as a better prospect for those seeking greater weight and towing capacities.