When it comes to choosing a new vehicle, a head-to-head comparison between models can be incredibly valuable. In this comparison, we dive deep into the specifics, contrasting the Ford Puma and MG ZS across numerous categories. Each holds its own in the market with distinct features and specifications that cater to different preferences and needs. We'll explore Model Info, Dimensions, Boot/Interior, Engines/Drivetrain, Consumption/Ecology, and Weight/Towing parameters, providing you with a comprehensive overview to inform your decision. So buckle up as we compare and contrast these two contenders to help you find the car that's tailored just for you.
# | Ford Puma | MG ZS | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Generation | Puma II (1. Facelift) (J2K) Change selected generation 2024 - Now | ZS 3. Generation Change selected generation 2024 - Now | |
Body | SUV | ||
Doors | 5 | ||
Vehicle class | Subcompact car (e.g., Polo) | ||
Engine | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
When it comes to dimensions, the MG ZS is the longer vehicle at 4323mm compared to the Ford Puma's 4186mm, potentially offering more room and presence on the road. However, the Puma has a marginally longer wheelbase, which may translate to more interior space and better handling. Width-wise, the ZS is slightly broader, both with and without mirrors - a consideration for those navigating tighter urban spaces. In terms of height and ground clearance, the MG ZS stands taller, possibly providing a more commanding driving position and better obstacle clearance, although the highest ground clearance for the Puma is attributed to the '1.0 EcoBoost Titanium' model at 166mm, surpassing the ZS's 161mm. The Puma boasts a tighter minimum turning circle, crucial for city driving, while the MG ZS's turning radii are consistently larger.