Length
1. Nissan Qashqai 2024 (new)
4425 mm
2. Ford Puma 2024 (new)
4186 mm
When it comes to choosing the perfect vehicle for your needs, comparing different models can provide valuable insights into which one might suit you best. Today, we delve into a comprehensive comparison between the Ford Puma and the Nissan Qashqai, looking at various parameters such as model information, dimensions, boot/interior space, engines/drivetrain specifics, consumption/ecology, and weight/towing capabilities. Each category sheds light on the strengths and weaknesses of these models, helping you make an informed decision.
| # | Ford Puma | Nissan Qashqai | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Generation | Puma II (1. Facelift) (J2K) Change selected generation 2024 - Now | Qashqai J12 (1. Facelift) (J12) Change selected generation 2024 - Now | |
| Body | SUV | SUV | |
| Doors | 5 | 5 | |
| Vehicle class | Subcompact car (e.g., Polo) | Compact car (e.g., Golf) | |
| Engine | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
In terms of dimensions, the Nissan Qashqai takes the lead in nearly every aspect compared to the Ford Puma. With a length of 4425 mm and a wheelbase of 2665 mm, the Qashqai offers more space, potentially translating to a more comfortable ride. It also features a wider body, both with and without mirrors, and stands taller, providing perhaps a more commanding view of the road. However, where ground clearance is concerned, the Ford Puma exhibits a range depending on the engine model, with its highest clearance surpassing the Qashqai, indicating superior off-road capability in specific configurations.
Boot space and interior capacity are crucial for practicality. The Nissan Qashqai again shines with a larger minimum and maximum boot space, especially noticeable when the rear seats are folded. Yet, it's worth mentioning that both vehicles offer the same seating capacity, ensuring both can cater to families of similar sizes. The presence of Isofix points in both models emphasizes their family-friendly nature.
Engine and drivetrain configurations reveal the diversity in performance across these two models. The Ford Puma’s engines range from 70 to 147 kW, covering a wide spectrum of power applicable to various driving needs. The Nissan Qashqai's engine power is moderately lower, with a maximum of 140 kW. Notably, the Qashqai's torque maximum slightly outperforms the Puma, potentially offering a bit more grunt in certain scenarios. Gears and cylinders vary between models, underscoring the manufacturers' attempts to balance efficiency and power.
Efficiency is increasingly important, and both models demonstrate strengths in different areas of consumption and ecology. The Ford Puma shines with a lower range in combined consumption and CO2 emissions under the WLTP cycle, perhaps appealing more to the environmentally conscious. However, the Nissan Qashqai's larger fuel tank means fewer stops at the petrol station, which could be considered a plus for long-distance drivers. This comparison suggests a trade-off between efficiency and convenience.
When it comes to weight and towing capabilities, the Nissan Qashqai generally presents itself as the more robust option, with higher permissible total weight and significantly higher braked trailer capacity. This could make it the preferred choice for those needing to tow trailers or carry heavier loads. However, for city dwellers or those with lighter transport needs, the Ford Puma’s specifications might prove more than adequate.
