Comparison:Mazda 626 1999 Vs. Ford Transit Courier 2023 (new)

#	Mazda 626	Ford Transit Courier	Add to comparison New comparison

Generation	GF/GW (1. Facelift) (GF) 1999 - 2002 Change selected generation	Transit Courier 2. Generation 2023 - Now Change selected generation
Body	Sedan	Small Commercial Van
Doors	4	3
Vehicle class	Mid-size car (e.g., 3 Series)	Subcompact car (e.g., Polo)
Engine	Select engine for the exact values to be shown	Select engine for the exact values to be shown
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Dimensions

Length

1. Mazda 626 1999 4590 mm

2. Ford Transit Courier 2023 (new) 4337 mm

Wheelbase

1. Ford Transit Courier 2023 (new) 2692 mm

2. Mazda 626 1999 2610 mm

Width

1. Ford Transit Courier 2023 (new) 1800 mm

2. Mazda 626 1999 1710 mm

Width including mirrors

1. Ford Transit Courier 2023 (new) 2076 mm

2. Mazda 626 1999 ? mm

Height

1. Ford Transit Courier 2023 (new) 1827 mm

2. Mazda 626 1999 1430 mm

Turning circle

1. Ford Transit Courier 2023 (new) 10.7 m

2. Mazda 626 1999 10.8 m

Boot/interior

Boot space

1. Mazda 626 1999 484 - 502 l

2. Ford Transit Courier 2023 (new) ?

Boot space (rear seats folded, bottom to roof)

1. Ford Transit Courier 2023 (new) 2900 l

2. Mazda 626 1999 ? l

Boot space (rear seats folded, bottom to windows)

1. Mazda 626 1999 875 l

2. Ford Transit Courier 2023 (new) ? l

Seats

1. Mazda 626 1999 5

2. Ford Transit Courier 2023 (new) 2

Max. seats

1. Mazda 626 1999 ?

2. Ford Transit Courier 2023 (new) ?

Doors

1. Mazda 626 1999 4

2. Ford Transit Courier 2023 (new) 3

Engines/drivetrain

Drive

1. Mazda 626 1999 Front-wheel drive

2. Ford Transit Courier 2023 (new) Front-wheel drive

Fuel

1. Mazda 626 1999 Diesel, Premium

2. Ford Transit Courier 2023 (new) Premium, Diesel

Gearbox

1. Mazda 626 1999 Manual Transmission, Automatic Transmission

2. Ford Transit Courier 2023 (new) Manual Transmission, Automatic Transmission

Gears

1. Ford Transit Courier 2023 (new) 6 - 7

2. Mazda 626 1999 4 - 5

Cylinders

1. Ford Transit Courier 2023 (new) 3 - 4

2. Mazda 626 1999 4

Max. speed

1. Mazda 626 1999 175 - 208 km/h

2. Ford Transit Courier 2023 (new) ?

Power

1. Mazda 626 1999 74 - 100 kW

2. Ford Transit Courier 2023 (new) 74 - 92 kW

Torque

1. Mazda 626 1999 152 - 230 Nm

2. Ford Transit Courier 2023 (new) 170 Nm

Cubic capacity

1. Mazda 626 1999 1840 - 1998 ccm

2. Ford Transit Courier 2023 (new) 998 - 1500 ccm

Acceleration 0-100km/h

1. Mazda 626 1999 9.6 - 13.5 s

2. Ford Transit Courier 2023 (new) ?

Consumption/ecology

Tank size

1. Mazda 626 1999 64 l

2. Ford Transit Courier 2023 (new) 44 - 45 l

Combined consumption (NEDC)

1. Mazda 626 1999 5.5 - 9.1 l/100km

2. Ford Transit Courier 2023 (new) ?

City consumption (NEDC)

1. Mazda 626 1999 6.8 - 12.3 l/100km

2. Ford Transit Courier 2023 (new) ?

Combined consumption (WLTP)

1. Mazda 626 1999 ? l/100km

2. Ford Transit Courier 2023 (new) ? l/100km

Emission standard

1. Mazda 626 1999 Euro 3, Euro 2 (up to 2500kg)

2. Ford Transit Courier 2023 (new) Truck

Tyre size

1. Mazda 626 1999 195/60R15H

2. Ford Transit Courier 2023 (new) 195/65R15

Noise

1. Ford Transit Courier 2023 (new) 66 - 68 dB

2. Mazda 626 1999 ?

Weight/towing

Empty weight (EU)

1. Mazda 626 1999 1245 - 1435 kg

2. Ford Transit Courier 2023 (new) ?

Permissible total weight

1. Mazda 626 1999 1695 - 1930 kg

2. Ford Transit Courier 2023 (new) ?

Braked trailer

1. Mazda 626 1999 1200 - 1600 kg

2. Ford Transit Courier 2023 (new) ?

Trailer (no brakes)

1. Mazda 626 1999 500 - 550 kg

2. Ford Transit Courier 2023 (new) ?

Max. roof load

1. Mazda 626 1999 100 kg

2. Ford Transit Courier 2023 (new) ? kg

Comparison:Mazda 626 1999 Vs. Ford Transit Courier 2023 (new)

Add to comparison

Dimensions

Boot/interior

Engines/drivetrain

Consumption/ecology

Weight/towing