Comparison:Mazda 626 1999 Vs. KIA Stonic 2017 (new)

#	Mazda 626	KIA Stonic	Add to comparison New comparison

Generation	GF/GW (1. Facelift) (GF) 1999 - 2002 Change selected generation	YB (YB) 2017 - Now Change selected generation
Body	Sedan	SUV
Doors	4	5
Vehicle class	Mid-size car (e.g., 3 Series)	Subcompact car (e.g., Polo)
Engine	Select engine for the exact values to be shown	Select engine for the exact values to be shown
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Dimensions

Length

1. Mazda 626 1999 4590 mm

2. KIA Stonic 2017 (new) 4140 mm

Wheelbase

1. Mazda 626 1999 2610 mm

2. KIA Stonic 2017 (new) 2580 mm

Width

1. KIA Stonic 2017 (new) 1760 mm

2. Mazda 626 1999 1710 mm

Width including mirrors

1. KIA Stonic 2017 (new) 2025 mm

2. Mazda 626 1999 ? mm

Height

1. KIA Stonic 2017 (new) 1505 mm

2. Mazda 626 1999 1430 mm

Ground clearance

1. KIA Stonic 2017 (new) 165 - 183 mm

2. Mazda 626 1999 ?

Turning circle

1. KIA Stonic 2017 (new) 10.4 m

2. Mazda 626 1999 10.8 m

Boot/interior

Boot space

1. Mazda 626 1999 484 - 502 l

2. KIA Stonic 2017 (new) 352 l

Boot space (rear seats folded, bottom to roof)

1. KIA Stonic 2017 (new) 1155 l

2. Mazda 626 1999 ? l

Boot space (rear seats folded, bottom to windows)

1. Mazda 626 1999 875 l

2. KIA Stonic 2017 (new) ? l

Seats

1. Mazda 626 1999 5

2. KIA Stonic 2017 (new) 5

Max. seats

1. Mazda 626 1999 ?

2. KIA Stonic 2017 (new) ?

Doors

1. KIA Stonic 2017 (new) 5

2. Mazda 626 1999 4

Isofix

1. Mazda 626 1999 ?

2. KIA Stonic 2017 (new) Serie

Engines/drivetrain

Drive

1. Mazda 626 1999 Front-wheel drive

2. KIA Stonic 2017 (new) Front-wheel drive

Fuel

1. Mazda 626 1999 Diesel, Premium

2. KIA Stonic 2017 (new) Premium, Diesel

Gearbox

1. KIA Stonic 2017 (new) Manual Transmission, Automated Manual Transmission (Dual-Clutch), Automatic Transmission

2. Mazda 626 1999 Manual Transmission, Automatic Transmission

Gears

1. KIA Stonic 2017 (new) 5 - 7

2. Mazda 626 1999 4 - 5

Cylinders

1. KIA Stonic 2017 (new) 3 - 4

2. Mazda 626 1999 4

Max. speed

1. Mazda 626 1999 175 - 208 km/h

2. KIA Stonic 2017 (new) 158 - 185 km/h

Power

1. KIA Stonic 2017 (new) 58 - 100 kW

2. Mazda 626 1999 74 - 100 kW

Torque

1. KIA Stonic 2017 (new) 113 - 280 Nm

2. Mazda 626 1999 152 - 230 Nm

Cubic capacity

1. Mazda 626 1999 1840 - 1998 ccm

2. KIA Stonic 2017 (new) 998 - 1598 ccm

Acceleration 0-100km/h

1. Mazda 626 1999 9.6 - 13.5 s

2. KIA Stonic 2017 (new) 10.4 - 14.2 s

Consumption/ecology

Tank size

1. Mazda 626 1999 64 l

2. KIA Stonic 2017 (new) 45 l

Combined consumption (NEDC)

1. KIA Stonic 2017 (new) 4.1 - 6.4 l/100km

2. Mazda 626 1999 5.5 - 9.1 l/100km

City consumption (NEDC)

1. KIA Stonic 2017 (new) 4.7 - 7.7 l/100km

2. Mazda 626 1999 6.8 - 12.3 l/100km

Combined consumption (WLTP)

1. KIA Stonic 2017 (new) ? l/100km

2. Mazda 626 1999 ? l/100km

CO2 emissions (WLTP)

1. KIA Stonic 2017 (new) 125 - 152 g/km

2. Mazda 626 1999 ?

Emission standard

1. Mazda 626 1999 Euro 3, Euro 2 (up to 2500kg)

2. KIA Stonic 2017 (new) Euro 6b (NEDC), Euro 6d-TEMP (WLTP) 36AG-AI, Euro 6d-TEMP-EVAP-ISC (WLTP) 36CH, 36CI, 36DG, Euro 6d-ISC-FCM (WLTP) 36AP-AR, Euro 6e (WLTP) 36EA

Tyre size

1. KIA Stonic 2017 (new) 185/65R15H

2. Mazda 626 1999 195/60R15H

Noise

1. KIA Stonic 2017 (new) 68 - 70 dB

2. Mazda 626 1999 ?

Weight/towing

Empty weight (EU)

1. KIA Stonic 2017 (new) 1145 - 1270 kg

2. Mazda 626 1999 1245 - 1435 kg

Permissible total weight

1. Mazda 626 1999 1695 - 1930 kg

2. KIA Stonic 2017 (new) 1600 - 1720 kg

Braked trailer

1. Mazda 626 1999 1200 - 1600 kg

2. KIA Stonic 2017 (new) 510 - 1110 kg

Trailer (no brakes)

1. Mazda 626 1999 500 - 550 kg

2. KIA Stonic 2017 (new) 450 kg

Max. roof load

1. Mazda 626 1999 100 kg

2. KIA Stonic 2017 (new) 70 kg

Max. towbar load

1. KIA Stonic 2017 (new) 75 kg

2. Mazda 626 1999 ?

Offroad

Departure angle

1. KIA Stonic 2017 (new) 28.7 - 30.4 °

2. Mazda 626 1999 ?

Approach angle

1. KIA Stonic 2017 (new) 13.8 - 16.4 °

2. Mazda 626 1999 ?

Comparison:Mazda 626 1999 Vs. KIA Stonic 2017 (new)

Add to comparison

Dimensions

Boot/interior

Engines/drivetrain

Consumption/ecology

Weight/towing

Offroad