Comparison:Mazda 626 1999 Vs. Renault Clio 2023 (new)

#	Mazda 626	Renault Clio	Add to comparison New comparison

Generation	GF/GW (1. Facelift) (GF) 1999 - 2002 Change selected generation	Clio V (1. Facelift) (RJA) 2023 - Now Change selected generation
Body	Sedan	Hatchback
Doors	4	5
Vehicle class	Mid-size car (e.g., 3 Series)	Subcompact car (e.g., Polo)
Engine	Select engine for the exact values to be shown	Select engine for the exact values to be shown
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Dimensions

Length

1. Mazda 626 1999 4590 mm

2. Renault Clio 2023 (new) 4053 mm

Wheelbase

1. Mazda 626 1999 2610 mm

2. Renault Clio 2023 (new) 2583 mm

Width

1. Renault Clio 2023 (new) 1798 mm

2. Mazda 626 1999 1710 mm

Width including mirrors

1. Renault Clio 2023 (new) 1988 mm

2. Mazda 626 1999 ? mm

Height

1. Renault Clio 2023 (new) 1440 mm

2. Mazda 626 1999 1430 mm

Ground clearance

1. Renault Clio 2023 (new) 142 mm

2. Mazda 626 1999 ?

Turning circle

1. Renault Clio 2023 (new) 10.4 m

2. Mazda 626 1999 10.8 m

Boot/interior

Boot space

1. Mazda 626 1999 484 - 502 l

2. Renault Clio 2023 (new) 301 - 391 l

Boot space (rear seats folded, bottom to roof)

1. Renault Clio 2023 (new) 1069 l

2. Mazda 626 1999 ? l

Boot space (rear seats folded, bottom to windows)

1. Mazda 626 1999 875 l

2. Renault Clio 2023 (new) ? l

Seats

1. Mazda 626 1999 5

2. Renault Clio 2023 (new) 5

Max. seats

1. Mazda 626 1999 ?

2. Renault Clio 2023 (new) ?

Doors

1. Renault Clio 2023 (new) 5

2. Mazda 626 1999 4

Isofix

1. Mazda 626 1999 ?

2. Renault Clio 2023 (new) Serie

Engines/drivetrain

Drive

1. Mazda 626 1999 Front-wheel drive

2. Renault Clio 2023 (new) Front-wheel drive

Fuel

1. Mazda 626 1999 Diesel, Premium

2. Renault Clio 2023 (new) Premium, LPG

Gearbox

1. Mazda 626 1999 Manual Transmission, Automatic Transmission

2. Renault Clio 2023 (new) Manual Transmission, Automatic Transmission, Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT)

Gears

1. Renault Clio 2023 (new) 1 - 6

2. Mazda 626 1999 4 - 5

Cylinders

1. Renault Clio 2023 (new) 3 - 4

2. Mazda 626 1999 4

Max. speed

1. Mazda 626 1999 175 - 208 km/h

2. Renault Clio 2023 (new) 160 - 174 km/h

Power

1. Renault Clio 2023 (new) 49 - 105 kW

2. Mazda 626 1999 74 - 100 kW

Torque

1. Mazda 626 1999 152 - 230 Nm

2. Renault Clio 2023 (new) 95 - 205 Nm

Cubic capacity

1. Mazda 626 1999 1840 - 1998 ccm

2. Renault Clio 2023 (new) 999 - 1598 ccm

Acceleration 0-100km/h

1. Mazda 626 1999 9.6 - 13.5 s

2. Renault Clio 2023 (new) 9.3 - 17.1 s

Consumption/ecology

Tank size

1. Mazda 626 1999 64 l

2. Renault Clio 2023 (new) 32 - 42 l

Combined consumption (NEDC)

1. Mazda 626 1999 5.5 - 9.1 l/100km

2. Renault Clio 2023 (new) ?

City consumption (NEDC)

1. Mazda 626 1999 6.8 - 12.3 l/100km

2. Renault Clio 2023 (new) ?

Combined consumption (WLTP)

1. Mazda 626 1999 ? l/100km

2. Renault Clio 2023 (new) 5.3 l/100km

CO2 emissions (WLTP)

1. Renault Clio 2023 (new) 97 - 130 g/km

2. Mazda 626 1999 ?

Emission standard

1. Mazda 626 1999 Euro 3, Euro 2 (up to 2500kg)

2. Renault Clio 2023 (new) Euro 6e (WLTP) 36EA

Tyre size

1. Renault Clio 2023 (new) 195/55R16H

2. Mazda 626 1999 195/60R15H

Noise

1. Renault Clio 2023 (new) 67 - 70 dB

2. Mazda 626 1999 ?

Weight/towing

Empty weight (EU)

1. Renault Clio 2023 (new) 1124 - 1331 kg

2. Mazda 626 1999 1245 - 1435 kg

Permissible total weight

1. Mazda 626 1999 1695 - 1930 kg

2. Renault Clio 2023 (new) 1530 - 1730 kg

Braked trailer

1. Mazda 626 1999 1200 - 1600 kg

2. Renault Clio 2023 (new) 900 kg

Trailer (no brakes)

1. Renault Clio 2023 (new) 560 - 665 kg

2. Mazda 626 1999 500 - 550 kg

Max. roof load

1. Mazda 626 1999 100 kg

2. Renault Clio 2023 (new) 80 kg

Max. towbar load

1. Renault Clio 2023 (new) 63 kg

2. Mazda 626 1999 ?

EV

Battery capacity - total

1. Renault Clio 2023 (new) 1.2 kWh

2. Mazda 626 1999 ?

Battery weight

1. Renault Clio 2023 (new) 38 kg

2. Mazda 626 1999 ?

Comparison:Mazda 626 1999 Vs. Renault Clio 2023 (new)

Add to comparison

Dimensions

Boot/interior

Engines/drivetrain

Consumption/ecology

Weight/towing

EV