Length
1. Opel Combo 2024 (new)
4401 mm
2. Toyota Proace City 2024 (new)
4401 mm
When it comes to choosing a commercial vehicle for your business or personal needs, the parameters of the vehicle in question play a pivotal role in determining its suitability. On this page, we delve deep to compare the Opel Combo and Toyota ProAce City, two seemingly similar vehicles that serve the 'Untere Mittelklasse' category. We meticulously assess each aspect, from dimensions and capacities to engine performance and eco-friendliness, ensuring to highlight the subtleties that set them apart.
| # | Opel Combo | Toyota Proace City | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Generation | Combo E (1. Facelift) (Combo-E) Change selected generation 2024 - Now | Proace City E (1. Facelift) (E) Change selected generation 2024 - Now | |
| Body | Small Commercial Van | High Roof Station Wagon | |
| Doors | 4 | 4 | |
| Vehicle class | Compact car (e.g., Golf) | Compact car (e.g., Golf) | |
| Engine | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Dimensions Deciphered: Dimensionally, these vehicles are twins - both stretching 4,403mm in length and standing 1,848mm wide (mirrors included), resting on a wheelbase of 2,785mm. Despite dimensional parity, the Opel Combo takes a slight lead in height, towering at 1,880mm compared to the ProAce City's 1,796mm, promising potential headroom comfort. Turning circles are remarkably close, with the Toyota offering a narrowly tighter minimum turning circle, potentially aiding in urban agility. Ground clearance differences are model-dependent in the Toyota, with a range between 160mm to 182mm. Inherent Advantage: Opel Combo-E (height). Potential Maneuverability Edge: Toyota ProAce City.
Boot and Interior Space Scrutiny: The cargo battle ends in a draw, with both vehicles boasting a substantial 3,300 liters of space when rear seats are folded to the roof. Seat counts are consistent across both models, yet the Opel Combo offers a higher maximum seating capacity - a trump card for those seeking to transport more passengers. Another nod to Opel comes with additional doors, reinforcing its earlier advantage in accessibility. Advantage: Opel Combo-E.
Engines and Drivetrain Dynamics: A veritable gearbox equality exists between the two, each offering between 1 and 8 gears. Cylinder configurations also draw even, ranging from 3 to 4. However, the Toyota ProAce City races ahead with a maximum speed potential of 200km/h against the Combo's 184km/h, paired with a broader power spectrum between 55kW to 100kW, mirroring that of the Opel. Torque figures are tied, while acceleration prowess is distinctly Toyota's arena, with the quickest ProAce City variant achieving 0-100km/h in a brisk 9.8 seconds. Performance Highlight: Toyota ProAce City.
Consumption and Ecological Considerations: Fuel tank sizes marginally differentiate the contenders, with the Toyota offering up to 61 liters against the Opel's 60 liters. The ecological battle heatens with CO2 emissions, resulting in a near neck-and-neck finish. The Toyota sneaks ahead with quieter operation at its minimum noise levels. Efficient consumption (NEDC) figures favor the Toyota, especially in the urban setting. Ecological Edge: Toyota ProAce City (marginally).
Heft and Towing Totems: Weight considerations crucially impact vehicle agility and fuel economy, with the Toyota ProAce City starting lighter but also weighing less at its heaviest compared to the Opel Combo. Both vehicles match permissible total weight and have similar braked trailer limits, but Toyota's ProAce City is capable of hauling the heavier trailer. Roof and towbar loads are comparably equal. Towing Superiority: Toyota ProAce City.
Electric Power Prowess: In the electrified stakes, the Opel Combo-E commands a significantly larger battery capacity at 75kWh, providing a greater WLTP range of between 326.0 to 336.0 km over the Toyota ProAce City's 276.0 to 284.0 km, asserting a clear dominance for those prioritizing range. Advantage: Opel Combo-E.