Length
Wheelbase
Width
Width including mirrors
Height
Turning circle
Boot/interior
For 'Boot/Interior', the Mazda Demio has a clearer advantage with a boot space of 330 liters against the Peugeot 208's range between 265 to 309 liters, depending on the engine (the e-208 156 Active notably has the least). The 208, however, takes the lead when the rear seats are folded, offering an impressive 1004 liters to the roof. The Demio offers more boot space when folding the rear seats to window-level, providing 679 liters. Both cars share the same seating capacity, reinforcing their positions as practical choices for a small family car or urban explorer.
Boot space
Boot space (rear seats folded, bottom to roof)
Boot space (rear seats folded, bottom to windows)
Seats
Max. seats
Doors
Isofix
Engines/drivetrain
In the 'Engines/Drivetrain' competition, the Mazda Demio runs with a 4-cylinder engine and a range of 4 to 5 gears, while the Peugeot 208 offers 3-cylinder engines and a gear range of 1 to 6, including their electric option. Even though the Demio's 4-cylinders might suggest robustness, the 208 can boast a higher maximum speed of 200 km/h (1.2 Hybrid 136 GT e-DSC6) compared to the Demio’s max of 160 km/h (1.5 Active). When it comes to power and torque, Peugeot stretches ahead with a range of 55 to 115 kW and 118 to 270 Nm, outpacing the Demio's 46 to 55 kW and 103 to 116 Nm. Despite this, at the entry-level end of cubic capacity, the Mazda Demio offers more with engines ranging from 1324 to 1498 ccm, compared to the 208’s 1199 ccm. The 208 redeems itself with quicker 0-100 km/h acceleration times across its range. Clearly, Peugeot has geared its vehicle towards more energetic performance characteristics.
Drive
Fuel
Gearbox
Gears
Cylinders
Max. speed
Power
Torque
Cubic capacity
Acceleration 0-100km/h
Consumption/ecology
On matters of 'Consumption/Ecology', the Peugeot 208 offers a slightly larger tank with 44 liters over the 43 liters in the Mazda Demio. However, specific consumption data favors the Mazda with a smaller difference between minimum and maximum consumption values. The larger tire size on the 208 might imply better grip, while CO2 emissions favor the Peugeot, particularly in its hybrid variants. Similarly, the noise range suggests that the 208 might offer a quieter ride overall.
Tank size
Combined consumption (NEDC)
City consumption (NEDC)
Combined consumption (WLTP)
CO2 emissions (WLTP)
Emission standard
Tyre size
Noise
Weight/towing
The 'Weight/Towing' category is quite telling of each vehicle’s capacities. The Mazda Demio is lighter, with an empty weight starting at 1030 kg, whereas the Peugeot 208 ranges from 1108 to 1530 kg, indicative of potential better fuel efficiency for the Mazda. Conversely, the 208 can handle a higher permissible total weight, indicating robustness and better carrying capability. For towing, the Demio can pull a braked trailer at 900 kg, which is quite significant against the Peugeot's range of 500 to 1200 kg depending on the engine. The maximum roof load is another win for the Peugeot at 70 kg, trumping the Demio’s 50 kg cap, demonstrating a slight edge in utility when it comes to carrying loads up top.
Empty weight (EU)
Permissible total weight
Braked trailer
Trailer (no brakes)
Max. roof load
Max. towbar load
EV
The 'Electric Vehicle' features of the Peugeot 208, represented by the e-208, show that it has entered the electric age with an offering of 361 to 410 km range depending on the model. The battery capabilities are also impressive, boasting a total capacity range of 50 to 54 kWh and a usable range of 46 to 51 kWh. This modern ambition makes a comparison with the more traditional Mazda Demio moot in this category; the Peugeot e-208 is squarely focused on sustainability and futureproofing in the EV market.