Comparison:Skoda Kamiq 2024 (new) Vs. Hyundai Kona 2023 (new)

Dimensions

Dimension-wise, the Skoda Kamiq edges the Hyundai Kona out by a margin of 36mm in length (4241mm vs. 4205mm) and 51mm in wheelbase (2651mm vs. 2600mm). However, the Hyundai Kona takes the lead when it comes to width (1800mm vs. 1793mm) and height (1565mm vs. 1527mm). Both cars have a similar ground clearance, ranging from 158mm to 173mm for the Hyundai Kona (depending on the engine variant) and 182mm to 188mm for the Skoda Kamiq. The Hyundai Kona also boasts a smaller turning circle (10.6m) compared to the Skoda Kamiq's (10.8m to 10.9m). While both vehicles have their own strengths and weaknesses when it comes to size, the Skoda Kamiq is slightly larger in general, while the Hyundai Kona offers superior maneuverability.

Boot/interior

As for boot and interior space, the Skoda Kamiq reigns supreme with a maximum boot capacity of 400 liters, compared to the Hyundai Kona's 374 liters. However, with rear seats folded, the Kona offers less boot space (1156 liters) than the Kamiq (1273 liters). Both vehicles have identical seating capacities of 5, featuring Isofix systems as standard. Ultimately, those looking to maximize boot space and rear cabin practicality may prefer the Skoda Kamiq.

Engines/drivetrain

Comparing engines and drivetrain capabilities, the Hyundai Kona offers engine variants with a higher maximum speed of 240km/h (compared to the Kamiq's 215km/h), more power (206kW vs. 110kW), and higher torque (395Nm vs. 250Nm). The Kona's highest cubic capacity is 1998ccm, while the Kamiq's stands at 1598ccm. Moreover, the Hyundai Kona records a faster acceleration time from 0 to 100km/h compared to the Skoda Kamiq. For those seeking superior engine performance, the Hyundai Kona offers a more powerful alternative to the Skoda Kamiq.

Consumption/ecology

In terms of consumption and ecology, the Hyundai Kona has a larger fuel tank capacity (50 liters) compared to the Skoda Kamiq (max. 50 liters). However, the Kamiq stands out with lower CO2 emissions (100g/km to 147g/km compared to Kona's 122g/km to 194g/km). Both vehicles share similar tire sizes and noise levels, but the Skoda Kamiq offers slightly better fuel efficiency, making it a more eco-friendly choice.

Weight/towing

When examining the vehicles' weight and towing capabilities, the Skoda Kamiq weighs less (1214kg to 1364kg) compared to the Hyundai Kona (1312kg to 1760kg). Additionally, the Kamiq has a lower permissible total weight, braked trailer towing capacity, and trailer (with no brakes) capacity than the Kona. However, the Kona offers a higher maximum roof load (80kg) compared to the Kamiq (75kg). While both vehicles have similar weight and towing specifications, the Hyundai Kona is overall more versatile when it comes to heavy cargo and towing.

EV

Lastly, comparing electric vehicle capabilities, the Hyundai Kona has a wider range of WLTP (305km to 484km) and larger battery capacities than Skoda Kamiq. For those considering an electric vehicle, the Hyundai Kona is the stronger contender, offering superior range and battery performance over the Skoda Kamiq.