Comparison:Suzuki S-Cross 2022 (new) Vs. VW Taigo 2021 (new)

Dimensions

The Suzuki S-Cross asserts its spatial dominance with a length of 4300 mm, a wheelbase of 2600 mm, and width of 1785 mm. Its width including mirrors is 2045 mm. It stands tall at 1580 mm and boasts a ground clearance of 175 mm. The VW Taigo trails slightly with a length of 4266 mm, wheelbase of 2554 mm, and overall width of 1757 mm, including mirrors stretching to 1995 mm. Its height is more modest at 1515 mm. The Taigo, however, excels with a marginally smaller turning circle of 10.60 m versus the S-Cross at 10.80 m. In dimensions, the Suzuki S-Cross generally provides more space, but the VW Taigo could be slightly more agile in tight spots.

Boot/interior

When it comes to luggage capacity, the VW Taigo offers a roomier boot with 455 liters compared to the Suzuki S-Cross's 430 liters. However, the S-Cross fights back with more space when the rear seats are folded, offering 1230 liters up to the roof and 665 liters up to the windows, the latter of which the Taigo doesn't specify. Both vehicles have seating for five, equivalent door count, and Isofix as standard. The Taigo might be the choice for those with heavier cargo needs, but the S-Cross shines for more extensive hauls.

Engines/drivetrain

In the mechanics department, the Suzuki S-Cross runs a tight ship with a 6-speed gearbox across the board, whereas the VW Taigo plays with variability, offering between 5 and 7 gears depending on the engine choice. The S-Cross also sticks with 4 cylinders for all its offerings, pushing past the Taigo's range of 3 to 4 cylinders. Top speed favours the Taigo, zipping ahead with values ranging from 183 km/h to an energetic 212 km/h, outpacing the S-Cross's 175 km/h to 195 km/h spectrum. Still, the S-Cross churns out max torque at 235 Nm, trouncing the Taigo's span of 175 to 250 Nm. Each car has its strengths, but one might lean towards the S-Cross for a steadier performance profile, or the Taigo for a bit more zest in the maximum speed department.

Consumption/ecology

With a 47-liter tank, the Suzuki S-Cross can likely stay on the road longer between fill-ups compared to the VW Taigo's 40-liter capacity. CO2 emission-wise, the S-Cross has a broader range from 118.0 to 139.0 g/km, slightly undercutting the Taigo's 123.0 to 134.0 g/km on the lower end. Tyre-wise, the S-Cross's 215/55R17 specification might offer a cushier ride than the Taigo's 205/60R16. Noise levels are also in favor of the S-Cross at 67 dB, peaking below the Taigo's 68-69 dB range. For the eco-conscious and peace-loving driver, the Suzuki S-Cross presents a slightly greener and quieter option.

Weight/towing

The skirmish of the scales has the Suzuki S-Cross weighing in between 1280 and 1435 kg, and the VW Taigo being a touch lighter between 1220 and 1304 kg. However, despite its weight advantage, the Taigo has a marginally lower permissible total weight range than the heavyweight champion S-Cross. In the towing arena, the S-Cross can lug heftier braked trailers, stretching from 1200 to 1500 kg, while the Taigo caps at 1000 to 1200 kg. Surprisingly, the Taigo pulls a bit of an upset with unbraked trailers, capable of towing between 610 and 650 kg over the S-Cross's 400 to 600 kg range. Both have the same max roof load, but the S-Cross can support a weightier towbar load. For heavy-duty tasks, the S-Cross often wins, although the Taigo can handle light unbraked loads with slightly more gusto.

Offroad

Ready for an offroad escapade? The VW Taigo flashes some credentials with a departure and approach angle of 16.60 and varied ramp angles between 14.50 and 14.70. Unfortunately, the Suzuki S-Cross's offroad data isn't at hand, but the comparison suggests that the Taigo might have the edge when the tarmac ends and the trails begin. For those looking to take the path less traveled, the Taigo could very well be the hardier companion.