Length
1. Skoda Karoq 2021 (new)
4390 mm
2. Toyota C-HR 2024 (new)
4362 mm
| # | Toyota C-HR | Skoda Karoq | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Generation | C-HR X20 (X20) Change selected generation 2024 - Now | Karoq 1. Generation (1. Facelift) (NU) Change selected generation 2021 - Now | |
| Body | SUV | SUV | |
| Doors | 5 | 5 | |
| Vehicle class | Compact car (e.g., Golf) | Compact car (e.g., Golf) | |
| Engine | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Regarding dimensions, both vehicles have an identical length of 4390mm, though the Karoq has a slightly narrower width (1841mm) compared to the C-HR (1795mm) but a wider width including mirrors, 2025mm against 2050mm for the Toyota. The Karoq is also slightly taller (1603mm) than the C-HR (1565mm). In terms of ground clearance, the Karoq ranges from 163mm to 176mm depending on the engine, with the 1.0 TSI Active offering the minimum clearance and the 2.0 TDI Ambition 4x4 DSG providing the maximum. The C-HR has a ground clearance of 142mm to 154mm with the 1.8 Hybrid Flow being the lowest and the 1.2 T Flow having the highest clearance. Finally, the Karoq has a turning circle ranging from 10.20m to 10.90m, while the C-HR offers a 10.40m turning circle, making the latter more maneuverable.
When it comes to boot space, the Skoda Karoq comes out on top with 521 liters, compared to the Toyota C-HR which offers 358 to 377 liters depending on the engine variant. However, with rear seats folded (bottom to windows), the C-HR provides 920 liters of luggage capacity as opposed to Skoda's unspecified amount. Both vehicles also offer seating capacity for five occupants with Isofix mounting points as standard features.
Engine options for the Skoda Karoq range from a 6 to 7-speed transmission, depending on the engine model, with the 1.0 TSI Active and the 1.5 TSI Ambition DSG being prime examples. Conversely, the Toyota C-HR offers a 1 to a 6-speed transmission, as showcased in the 1.8 Hybrid Flow and the 1.2 T Flow. The Karoq's power ranges between 81kW to 140kW, whereas the C-HR varies between 85kW and 135kW. In terms of speed, the Karoq has a maximum of 221 km/h (2.0 TSI Sportline 4x4 DSG), while the C-HR's top speed is 190 km/h (1.2 T Flow).
When comparing fuel consumption, the Skoda Karoq has a combined (NEDC) consumption of 4.1 to 6.6 liters per 100km, and the Toyota C-HR offers a slightly better 3.8 to 6.1 liters per 100km. The Karoq also has a larger fuel tank, with a capacity of 50-55 liters depending on the engine chosen, while the C-HR offers a 43-50 liter tank. CO2 emissions (WLTP) range from 112g/km to 171g/km for Karoq and 109g/km to 154g/km for the C-HR, making the latter a more eco-friendly option.
The Skoda Karoq has an empty weight of 1365 to 1607kg depending on the engine, while the Toyota C-HR weighs between 1375 and 1485kg. As for towing capacity, the Karoq can tow between 1200 and 2100kg (braked trailer), and the C-HR ranges from 725 to 1300kg. Both vehicles have a maximum roof load of 75kg, but the Karoq has a higher max towbar load (90kg) compared to the C-HR (75kg).
On the offroad aspect, the Skoda Karoq's departure angle ranges from 19.4 to 19.8 degrees (depending on the engine) and an approach angle of 18.3 to 18.8 degrees. The C-HR, on the other hand, has an approach angle of 14 to 15 degrees depending on the engine. The C-HR also features a ramp angle of 26 to 27 degrees.
As for electric vehicle capability, the Toyota C-HR features a battery capacity of 1.3kWh and a battery weight of 40.0kg, while the Skoda Karoq does not offer any specified electric features.
